This recent story is from the discussion forum Expatexposed. It tells how grinding penny pinching becomes a way of life with nothing to compensate it, rather than a short term measure to get ahead. The poster also tells of how carefully 'Brand New Zealand' is manipulated to attract people who turn out to be unsuitable migrants:
"I am so tired of Kiwis making a virtue of necessity. They should be honest that THAT is what it is - making do on a cute remote island. Nothing more than that. Not an arcane "lifestyle" to be aspired to (cue: clink wineglass of Sauvignon Blanc, look out to blue water, flash impossibly white teeth at partner that you would never see on a Kiwi because most of them don't do dental).
There's nothing here to compensate for the forced pennypinching - little opportunity, no rich culture, you can't easily travel to other places for a change - nothing. The government and migration agencies are dressing New Zealand up and not being honest about what it is really like here - THAT is my biggest gripe.
If you are rich, boaty and/or fetishize nature, you will LOVE it here, and you won't have to make sacrifices, or the sacrifices may well be worth it. I am not rich, boaty and do not fetishize nature.
I DO wear woolly socks and jumpers inside, and I did that before I came here. I shop secondhand "just because it is sensible". I make food from scratch. I totally agree - it's sensible and no less, regardless. I have NEVER had central heating or double-glazed windows in any house I have lived in, though I aspired to such back home where I was able to afford to buy my own house. I used to put thermal plastic sheeting on my windows to keep warm in winter. I will hunt that stuff down for this year in NZ if I haven't been able to leave by winter. At home, I had a gas furnace (not a standalone heater) and my heating was, under a special distributive program where they spread the money out for winter heating to summer months so you don't get these big lumps to pay in winter) about 80 a month USD (that's about, what, 100 NZD?). Just to give you a comparison.
The difference is that back there, I lived this same way and was able to save money and get ahead by being frugal. I could afford better food and I didn't have to darn big holes in socks. I'd darn a little hole or two and then when the socks persisted in developing more holes, I would give them away to the local animal shelter inside a pillowcase for the animals to use. I had money to travel and visit people.
I've lived frugally before - and was able to GET AHEAD by doing so. I was able to save thousands a year doing that. Here, you are FORCED to live that way just to keep your head above water, and you are lucky if you can save anything. Maybe some year upward mobility will pull you into its wake if you can catch the wave at the right time...you can only climb the rungs of the ladder with great difficulty in New Zealand, and just hope you don't have a setback that sends you back to START. It's easy to have that happen to you if you have no family here to cushion your setbacks for you.
I do not consider that the people of New Zealand are beneath me. I perceive that they "make do" valiantly with what they have. I have seen them be amazingly creative making good useful things out of nothing. The housewives use everything but the squeal. Jesus, do I have to want to live like that, though? This is admirable, and I'd do it if I had to, but why pay out the nose to do that? Kiwis are both shaped and limited by having to live that way. They don't have time for intellectual pursuits? Just LIVING here occupies enough of their effort, so ok, it's understandable (Google "culture of New Zealand", "anti-intellectualism" if you think I am being a snob). People have crafted the Wiki entry to reflect reality, better, I think, since I came over some years ago, and I think prospective migrants should read it:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Culture_of_New_Zealand#Anti-intellectualism (See below*)
I don't think you're aware of how carefully they manipulate Brand New Zealand to attract people who in actuality turn out to be highly unsuitable migrants. That's where I perceive my fight to be on EE, is representing the reality of New Zealand as I personally experienced it, as one of those unsuitable migrants, so I can prevent other people from making the same mistake I did. It's the only way I can make lemonade out of my own lemons! That's why many of the members post here - they are either venting or making sure the downside gets "out there", hoping that googlers will be able to find and read it through all the net-bombing by "paradise"-mongers who are trying to represent New Zealand as a place that it is NOT."
*Anti-intellectualism in NZ (Wikipedia)
"Unlike many European countries, but in common with other 'Anglo' countries such as Britain, the United States and Australia, New Zealanders do not have a particularly high regard for intellectual activity, particularly if it is more theoretical than practical. This is linked with the idea of 'kiwi ingenuity' (see above), which supposes that all problems are better solved by seeing what works than by applying a theory.
This distrust of theory manifested itself in social policy of the early and mid twentieth century, which historian Michael Bassett described as 'socialism without doctrines': although the policies of the first Labour and other governments pursued traditionally socialist goals, they were not based on any coherent theory. A major break with this tradition came in the 1980s when the fourth Labour and fourth National governments enacted a series of reforms based on free market ideology.
This reinforced many New Zealanders' distrust of intellectual theory, as many consider that the reforms increased poverty and inequality in New Zealand. Despite the prevailing mood of anti-intellectualism, New Zealand has reasonably high rates of participation in tertiary education and has produced a number of internationally renowned scholars and scientists, including Ernest Rutherford, J.G.A. Pocock and Alan MacDiarmid. It should be noted that both Rutherford and Pocock spent most of their professional lives in Britain. For many years this was a common occurrence, and a consequence both of New Zealanders' attitudes and the low population which made it hard to support major research.
Because New Zealanders often have to relocate to achieve worldwide fame and fortune, New Zealanders are keen to claim famous people as being New Zealanders, however short their residency in New Zealand might have been.
While people born in New Zealand are certainly identified as New Zealanders, those who attended a New Zealand school or resided in New Zealand also qualify, irrespective of national origin. This sometimes leads to famous people and innovations being identified as coming from both New Zealand and another country—such as the pop group Crowded House, the race horse Phar Lap and the actor Russell Crowe, all of whom have been associated with Australia and New Zealand.
Because the measure of New Zealand success was often how well a person did internationally, anything from 'Overseas' is seen as holding more cultural capital than the local equivalent, regardless of its quality.
This means that New Zealanders are often lured to the performances of "international acts". This is exacerbated by New Zealand's isolation and small population causing it to be skipped by the international tours of all but the most commercially successful musicians and performers. The flipside to this phenomenon is that famous people from overseas can be quickly embraced by New Zealanders if they visit regularly or for an extended period or claim an affinity with the country."
For today's posts - click here